ADA & WCAG 2.2 Compliance for Credit Union Websites: The Complete 2026 Guide

Written for credit union CEOs, compliance officers, and marketing leaders who need to understand exactly what ADA compliance means for their digital presence — and what happens if they don't act.

Introduction: The Accessibility Wake-Up Call Credit Unions Can No Longer Ignore

Let's start with a question that makes most credit union executives uncomfortable: If a member with a visual impairment tried to open an account on your website right now, could they actually do it?

Not just browse. Not just read. Actually navigate, interact, complete forms, upload documents, and submit an application — entirely using a screen reader, keyboard navigation, or voice control.

If you're not sure, you're not alone. But being unsure is no longer a defense.

In 2025, federal ADA website accessibility lawsuits hit an all-time high, with over 4,600 cases filed — a 12% increase from the previous year. Financial institutions, including credit unions, were among the most targeted industries. And 2026 is on track to surpass that number.

For credit unions, the stakes are uniquely high. Unlike megabanks with billion-dollar legal budgets and dedicated accessibility teams, most credit unions operate with lean compliance resources. A single lawsuit — or even a well-publicized demand letter , can drain operational budgets, damage member trust, and distract leadership for months.

But here's what most compliance articles don't tell you: ADA compliance is not just about avoiding lawsuits. It's about capturing an underserved market of 61 million Americans with disabilities , a demographic that controls over $490 billion in disposable income. It's about ranking higher in search. It's about building a website that works better for every single member.

If you don't have members with disabilities, skip this article. But if your credit union serves real people , and you want to serve them better, serve them safely, and serve them more effectively than the megabanks down the street, , keep reading. This is the complete 2026 guide to ADA and WCAG 2.2 compliance for credit union websites.

Section 1: The Legal Landscap, . Why ADA Compliance Is No Longer Optional for Credit Unions

1.1 The Americans with Disabilities Act and Digital Accessibility

The ADA was signed into law in 19, 0 , three years before the first graphical web browser was released. It was never written with websites in mind. But over the past decade, federal courts have consistently interpreted Title III of the ADA (which prohibits discrimination in "places of public accommodation") to include websites.

In 2024, the Department of Justice issued a final rule under Title II of the ADA, explicitly requiring state and local government websites to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards. While Title II applies to public entities, the ruling set a clear benchmark that private plaintiffs and courts have increasingly applied to Title III cases as well.

For credit unions, the legal exposure comes from two directions:

Private lawsuits: Individuals with disabilit, es , often represented by a small number of highly active plaintiff f, rms , file Title III ADA lawsuits against websites that are not accessible. These suits typically demand monetary damages (where state law allows), attorney's fees, and a court-ordered remediation plan.

NCUA and regulatory scrutiny: While the NCUA does not directly enforce ADA compliance, credit unions are subject to federal nondiscrimination requirements under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA), the Fair Housing Act, and Regulation B. An inaccessible digital lending platform can be interpreted as discriminatory under these regulations, opening the door to CFPB or NCUA enforcement actions.

1.2 The Cost of Non-Compliance

The average ADA website lawsuit settlement in 2025 ranged from $15,000 to $75,000 for smaller defendants, with some cases exceeding $200,000 in combined damages, attorney's fees, and remediation costs. But the financial cost is only part of the picture.

Reputational damage: ADA lawsuits are public record. They appear in board reports, regulatory filings, and , increa, ingly , in local news coverage. For a credit union that has built its brand on community trust and member service, a public lawsuit over accessibility sends a devastating message to members with disabilities.

Operational disruption: Remediation plans forced by litigation often require aggressive timelines, emergency vendor contracts, and rushed development work. The result is almost always more expensive , and less eff, ctive, , than proactive compliance.

Lost members: Every day your website remains inaccessible, you are turning away members with disabilities. Consider this: 26% of adults in the United States have some type of disability, according to the CDC. For credit unions serving aging membe, base, , many credit unions report that 40% or more of their membership is, over , 5 , accessibility isn't just a compliance issue. It's a retention crisis waiting to happen.

Section 2:. WCAG , .2 . What Changed and What Credit Unions Need to Know

2.1 Understanding WCAG: The Technical Standard for Digital Accessibility

The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) are the internationally accepted standard for digital accessibility. Published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), WCAG provides a comprehensive framework for making web content accessible to people with disabilities.

WCAG is organized around four core , rinci, les , often remembered by the acronym POUR:

• Perceivable: Information and user interface components must be presentable to users in ways they can perceive. This means providing text alternatives for non-text content, captions for multimedia, and content that can be presented in different ways without losing information.
• Operable: User interface components and navigation must be operable. This includes making all functionality available from a keyboard, giving users enough time to read and use content, and not designing content in ways that are known to cause seizures or physical reactions.
• Understandable: Information and the operation of the user interface must be understandable. Text must be readable and predictable, and input assistance should help users avoid and correct mistakes.
• Robust: Content must be robust enough to be interpreted by a wide variety of user agents, including assistive technologies. This means maximizing compatibility with current and future user tools.

2.2 WCAG 2.2: New Success Criteria

WCAG 2.2, published in October 2023, introduced nine new success criteria beyond WCAG 2.1. For credit union websites, the most impactful additions include:

2.4.11 Focus Not Obscure, (Min, mum) . Level AA: When a user interface component receives keyboard focus, the component must not be entirely hidden by author-created content. In plain language: if a member tabs through your online loan application, the focused field should never be hidden behind a sticky header, a chatbot widget, or a pop-up notification. This is critical for credit union sites that use persistent navigation bars, floating CTAs, or chatbot widgets during the online account opening process.

2.4.12 Focus Not Obscure, (Enh, nced) . Level AAA: A stricter version requiring that no part of the focused component be hidden by author-created content. While not required for Level AA compliance, credit unions aiming for best-in-class accessibility should consider this standard, especially for high-traffic transaction pages.

2.4.13 Foc, s App, arance . Level AAA: Requires that the keyboard focus indicator be at least as thick as a 2 CSS pixel border, have a color contrast ratio of at least 3:1 against adjacent colors, and cover an area at least as large as a 4 CSS pixel border. Many credit union websites still use the browser's default focus indicator (a faint dotted outline) or have removed it entirely for aes, hetic, reasons , both of which are significant violations.

2.5.7 Dra, ging , ovements . Level AA: All functionality that can be operated by a dragging movement must also be operable by a single pointer without dragging. If your credit union's online banking platform uses drag-and-drop for check deposit alignment, bill pay organization, or account sorting, you need an accessible alternative. This is a common pain point for credit unions that have adopted modern fintech interfaces.

2.5.8 Targe. Size, (Minimum) . Level AA: The size of clickable targets must be at least 24 by 24 CSS pixels. This affects everything from navigation menu items and CTA buttons to form field inputs and link text. For mobile-responsive cred, t uni, n websites , where members are often tapping button, on s, all screens , this criterion is especially relevant. Tiny "submit" buttons, closely packed navigation links, and small icon-only controls are all violations.

3., .6 Co, sistent Help . Level A: If a website provides help mechanisms (such as a contact page, a help center, or a chatbot), those mechanisms must appear in the same relative order on each page. For credit union websites, this means your "Contact Us" link, your phone number, and your chatbot widget should be consistently placed ac, oss t, e entire site , not moving around depending on which page section or product category the member is viewing.

3.3.7 Accessible Aut, entic, tion (Minimum) . Level AA: Cognitive function tests (like remembering a password or answering a security question) must have an alternative that does not rely on a cognitive function test. This is a game-changer for online banking authentication. If your credit union requires members to recall a specific password, answer a security question, or complete a CAPTCHA, you must provide alternatives such as:

• Biometric authentication (fingerprint or facial recognition on mobile)
• SMS or email one-time passcodes
• Physical security keys (FIDO2/WebAuthn)
• Single sign-on through a trusted provider

For credit unions, servi, g older members , who may have cognitive impairments, memory issues, or less familiarity with complex au, henti, ation procedures , this criterion is not just a compliance requirement. It's a usability revolution.

3.3.8 Accessible A, thent, cation (Enhanced) . Level AAA: Extends the requirement to remove all cognitive function tests, including object recognition (CAPTCHAs asking users to "select all images with bicycles") and personal content (asking the member to recall a specific piece of information they provided).

2.3 WCAG Compliance Levels: What Credit Unions Should Target

WCAG defines three compliance levels:

• Level A: The minimum level of conformance. Addresses the most critical barriers. By itself, Level A is rarely sufficient to mitigate legal risk.
• Level AA: The standard that most legal settlements, consent decrees, and industry best practices reference. This is the target every credit union should aim for. All nine new criteria in WCAG 2.2 that are rated AA fall into this category.
• Level AAA: The highest level of conformance. Not required by most legal standards, but a strong differentiator for credit unions that want to position themselves as accessibility leaders.

Our recommendation: Every credit union website should target WCAG 2.2 Level AA compliance as a minimum. This is the standard referenced in virtually all ADA lawsuit settlements, and it aligns with the DOJ's Title II rule. Credit unions with significant older member populations, those serving communities with higher disability rates, or those positioning themselves as digital leaders should push toward Level AAA where practical.

Section 3: How to Conduct an ADA Compliance Audit for Your Credit Union Website

3.1 Automated Testing: The First Pass

Automated accessibility testing tools can identify roughly 30–40% of WCAG violations. They are essential for catching technical issues quickly but are not sufficient on their own. Key tools for credit union websites include:

WAVE (Web Accessibility Evaluation Tool): A browser extension that provides visual feedback about accessibility issues directly on your web pages. WAVE is excellent for identifying missing alt text, contrast errors, and structural issues.

axe DevTools: A powerful automated testing engine that integrates directly into browser developer tools. axe catches more issues than most free tools and provides clear guidance on remediation.

Lighthouse: Built into Chrome's developer tools, Lighthouse includes an accessibility audit as part of its broader performance and SEO analysis. It's free, fast, and provides a starting score that's useful for tracking improvement over time.

Siteimprove or AccessiBe: Enterprise-grade platforms that offer ongoing monitoring and detailed reporting. For credit unions with larger websites (100+ pages), these tools provide the most comprehensive automated coverage.

3.2 Manual Testing: Where the Real Issues Live

Automated tools can't catch everything. Manual testing is essential for identifying accessibility barriers that require human judgment. Every credit union should conduct manual testing on these critical workflows:

Online account opening or membership application: This is the most important accessibility workflow on your website. Test it manually using only a keyboard. Can a user na, igate, through every step , from selecting account type to submitting ident, ty ve, ification documents , without ever touching a mouse?

Loan application process: Credit unions generate significant revenue from lending. If your online loan application is inaccessible, you are , ot ju, t failing compliance , you are losing loan applications.

Online banking login and dashboard: The most frequently accessed feature on your site. Test the login process with a screen reader. Can a member with visual impairment log in, check their balance, and transfer funds?

Branch and ATM locator: Often overlooked in accessibility audits. A member with a mobility disability needs to find a branch with accessible parking. A member with visual impairment needs the locator to work with their screen reader.

Search functionality: Can a keyboard-only user activate the search box, type a query, and navigate results? Does the search results page announce the number of results to screen reader users?

Contact forms and support requests: If members can't submit a support request because your contact form has inaccessible captchas, missing field labels, or confusing error messages, you're creating a liability with every frustrated attempt.

3.3 Assistive Technology Testing

Testing with real assistive technology reveals issues that no other method can catch. The minimum testing regimen for any credit union website should include:

Screen reader testing: Test with NVDA (free, Windows) and VoiceOver (built into macOS/iOS). These are the two most widely used screen readers, and they interpret accessibility code differently. A page that works perfectly in VoiceOver may be completely unusable in NVDA.

Keyboard-only navigation: Navigate every page and complete every critical workflow using only the Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter, and Arrow keys. Pay special attention to, custo, interactive elements , drop-down menus, modal dialogs, date , icker, , and accordion panels , which are notorious for keyboard accessibility failures.

Zoom testing: Zoom your browser to 200% and test every workflow. Does the layout break? Do buttons become unreachable? Do form fields overflow their containers? Multiple credit unions have been sued specifically because the, r web, ites broke at 200% zoom , a relatively simple thing to test and fix.

Mobile accessibility testing: Test on actual mobile devices, not just responsive emulation in desktop browsers. Touch targets that pass the 24x24 pixel test in desktop view may fail on a small phone screen. Check that swipe gestures have keyboard alternatives.

Se, tion , : Remediation Strategies . From Audit to Accessible Design

4.1 Common Accessibility Issues on Credit Union Websites

Based on audits of hundreds of financial websites, these are the most common WCAG violations found on credit union websites:

Low color contrast (WCAG 1.4.3): The most frequently cited accessibility issue across all industries. Credit union websites often use brand colors that look grea, but , ail contrast requirements , light gray text on white backgrounds, soft brand colors for links, and gradient buttons with insufficient contrast against their text.

Missing or inadequate alternative text (WCAG 1.1.1): Images of branch locations, team member photos, product icons, and infographics often lack descriptive alt text. More critically, decorative images that should have null alt text (alt="") are frequently left with no alt attribute at all, causing screen readers to announce the image filename.

Missing form labels (WCAG 1.3.1, 4.1.2): Online account opening applications, loan applications, and contact forms frequently use hint text as the only visible label. When the user starts t, typing, the hint text disappears, leaving no visible label and often no programmatic label that a screen reader can announce.

Inaccessible modals and dialogs (WCAG 2.4.3, 4.1.2): Pop-up windows for special offers, cookie consent banners, chatbot widgets, and rate lock confirmations are frequently inaccessible. They may not trap focus correctly, may not announce their appearance to screen readers, and may not be dismissible from the keyboard.

Focus order and keyboard traps (WCAG 2.1.1, 2.4.3):. Custom interactive elements , such as mortgage calculators, rate compa, ison , ools, and interactive charts , often fail to manage keyboard focus correctly. Users can get trapped in a component with no way to tab out, or the focus order jumps around the page unpredictably.

Missing or incorrect heading structure (WCAG 1.3.1): Many credit union websites use visual styling (large font, bold weight) to create the appearance of headings without using actual heading elements. Screen reader users navigate by headings, and without proper heading markup, they cannot efficiently explore the page.

4.2 Remediation Approaches: Quick Fixes vs. Long-Term Solutions

Quick fixes (can be implemented in days):

• Add alt text to images
• Fix color contrast issues in CSS
• Add proper heading structure
• Configure ARIA labels on form fields
• Fix focus indicators in CSS
• Add skip-to-content links
• Resolve keyboard traps in existing components

Medium-term solutions (weeks to months):

• Redesign custom components (modals, accordions, tabs, date pickers) to meet accessibility standards
• Implement accessible form validation and error messaging
• Add captions and transcripts to video content
• Restructure navigation for keyboard and screen reader accessibility
• Develop accessibility documentation and component libraries

Long-term strategic changes (months to quarters):

• Redesign online banking platform or negotiate accessibility requirements with your core processor
• Implement accessible authentication (biometric, passkey, or OTP alternatives)
• Build an accessibility governance program
• Training for developers, content authors, and procurement teams
• Integration of accessibility testing into your deployment pipeline

4.3 The Accessibility Overlay Trap

A growing number of v, ndors, sell "accessibility overlays" . JavaScript widgets that claim to automatically fix website accessibility issues. These products are aggressively marketed to credit unions and other organizations facing compliance pressure.

The problem: Multiple disability rights organizations, including the National Federation of the Blind, have publicly stated that overlays do not and cannot achieve genuine accessibility. In fact, several lawsuits have specifically named overlay vendors as co-defendants, arguing that the overlay itself creates additional barriers.

In our assessment, overlays can be useful as a temporary bridge solution while comprehensive remediation is underway. They should never be presented as a compliance solution or a substitute for proper accessible development. If a vendor promises "instant ADA compliance" through an overlay, that is a red flag.

4.4 Budgeting for Accessibility Remediation

The cost of fixing accessibility issues varies dramatically depending on the size of your website, the severity of violations, and whether you are building new accessible features or retrofitting existing ones. Here is a realistic framework for credit union budgeting:

Small credit unions (under $100 million in assets, basic website, 10–30 pages): $5,000–$15,000 for a full audit plus remediation of the most critical pages. Most of the work involves content and CSS changes rather than development.

Mid-size credit unions ($100 million to $1 billion, content-managed website, 50 to 200 pages): $15,000 to $50,000 for a comprehensive audit and phased remediation. This typically includes rebuilding custom components, training content authors, and implementing ongoing monitoring.

Large credit unions (over $1 billion, digital banking platform, 200+ pages, multiple subdomains): $50,000 to $200,000+ for a full program. This includes platform-level accessibility work (online banking, mobile apps), governance, procurement requirements, and ongoing testing.

Compare these figures to the $15,000 to $75,000 minimum set, lemen, cost for a single ADA lawsuit , not to mention the reputational damage, leadership distraction, and man, ated , ggressive remediation timelines , and proactive investment becomes a clear business decision.

Section 5: Choosing the Right Web Design Partner for ADA Compliance

5.1 What to Look For

Not every web design agency understands credit union accessibility requirements. When evaluating partners for a website redesign or accessibility remediation, look for:

Demonstrated WCAG expertise: Ask for case studies of WCAG 2.2 AA compliance work, specifically for financial institutions. A general-purpose web agency may not understand the unique accessibility challenges of online account opening, loan applications, or regulatory disclosures.

Experience with credit union platforms: Many credit union websites integrate with core processing systems, digital banking platforms, and third-party lending solutions. Your design partner needs to understand how accessibility req, ireme, ts interact with these platforms , and when the platform itself is the barrier.

Testing methodology: A serious accessibility partner will not rely solely on automated tools. They should conduct manual testing by people with disabilities, use real assistive technology, and provide detailed remediation roadmaps.

Ongoing support: Accessibility is not a one-time project. Your partner should offer ongoing monitoring, content author training, and periodic re-audits to ensure compliance is maintained as your website evolves.

5.2 Red Flags to Avoid

Promises of "instant compliance": Genuine WCAG 2.2 AA compliance for a medium-sized credit union website takes 3 to 6 months of focused work. Anyone promising instant or overnight compliance is either selling an overlay or misrepresenting the scope of the work.

No credit union experience: Financial servic, s acc, ssibility has unique requirements , regulatory disclosures, security constraints, complex form workflows, integration with legacy systems. An agency without credit union experience will struggle with these nuances.

Overlay-first approach: If an accessibility partner leads with an overlay widget rather than a comprehensive audit and remediation plan, walk away.

No post-launch plan: Accessibility is an ongoing commitment, not a project with a finish line. If the partner doesn't offer monitoring, training, and re-audits, you will regress within months.

, h2 id, "roi">Section 6: The Business Case . Why Accessibility Drives Member Acquisition and Retention

6.1 The Market Opportunity

Sixty-one million Americans have a disability, according to t, e CDC. That's 26% of the adult population , roughly one in four adults. And they control over $490 billion in disposable income, according to the American Institutes for Research.

For credit unions, this is not a niche market. Consider the demographics:

• Adults 65 and older: 40% have a disability. This is the age group with the highest credit union membership rates.
• Veterans: 28% of veterans have a disability. Credit unions serve military communities at disproportionately high rates.
• Rural communities:. Disab, lity rates are higher in rural areas , precisely where credit unions are often the primary financial institution.

6.2 Accessibility Improves SEO

Many accessibility best practices directly overlap with search engine optimization (SEO) best practices:

• Alternative text on images helps screen readers and helps Google understand image content, improving image search rankings.
• Proper heading structure helps screen reader navigation and helps Google understand content hierarchy, improving organic rankings.
• Descriptive link text helps screen reader users understand link destinations and improves anchor text relevance for SEO.
• Fast loading pages benefit users with cognitive disabilities and are a confirmed Google ranking factor.
• Mobile-friendly design benefits users with motor disabilities and is essential for mobile-first indexing.
• Clear, readable content benefits users with cog, itive, disabilities and reduces bounce rates , a signal Google uses for ranking.

When we analyzed GSC data for credit union websites, the keyword cluster around "ADA compliant credit union website" and r, lated, terms had over 70 unserved impressions , searches happening today that no credit union website is properly answering. A well-optimized, genuinely accessible ADA compliance guide is the type of content that captures that traffic.

6.3 Accessibility Builds Trust

Credit unions compete on trust. The "people helping people" philosophy is the industry's core differentiator against megabanks. An accessible websit, is t, e digital embodiment of that philosophy , a visible, verifiable commitment that your credit union serves all members, not just those who can see, hear, and navigate without assistance.

When a member with a disability can open an account independently, apply for a loan without ass, stanc, , and manage their finances with dignity , that member does not leave. Accessibility is a retention driver disguised as a compliance requirement.

Section 7: Building an Ongoing Accessibility Program

7.1 Governance and Policy

Accessibility cannot be delegated entirely to your web development team or your compliance officer. It requires cross-functional ownership. Key elements of an accessibility governance program:

Accessibility policy: A documented policy, approved by the board or executive team, stating your credit union's commitment to WCAG 2.2 AA compliance. This policy should reference public-facing website accessibility, online banking platforms, and mobile applications.

Accessibility statement: A public page on your website that states your commitment, lists your current compliance level, provides contact information for reporting accessibility issues, and describes your testi, g met, odology. This is not just a best practice , it is referenced in many legal settlements as a required remediation step.

Accessibility champion: Designate an internal accessibility champion who owns the program. This person should have authority to enforce standards, budget for remediation, and escalate issues to leadership.

7.2 Training

Accessibility training should be provided to:

• Web developers: Technical training on WCAG criteria, ARIA, accessible component development, and testing tools
• Content authors and marketers:, /stro, g> Training on accessible content creation , heading structure, alt text, descriptive links, accessible document formats
• Procurement teams:. Training on evaluating vendor accessibility , including how to review VPATs (Voluntary Product Accessibility Templates) and negotiate accessibility requirements in contracts
• Leadership: Strategic overview of legal risk, market opportunity, and governance requirements

7.3 Continuous Monitoring

Accessibility is not a one-time fix. Every new page, every content update, every plugin or theme update, and every new vendor integration can introduce new accessibility issues. An ongoing monitoring program should include:

• Monthly automated scans of the full website using tools like WAVE or Siteimprove
• Quarterly manual testing of the most critical workflows (account opening, loan application, online banking)
• Annual expert audit by an accessibility consultancy with WCAG 2.2 expertise
• Continuous regression testing whenever development changes are deployed
• User testing with people with disabilities at least once per year

Frequently Asked Questions

Does ADA compliance apply to credit union websites?

Yes. Federal courts have consistently held that Title III of the ADA applies to commercial websites, including credit union websites. While there is no explicit statutory requirement, the legal precedent is decisively in favor of ADA applicability to digital properties.

What is the WCAG standard for credit union websites?

The standard benchmark is WCAG 2.2 Level AA. This is the standard referenced in most ADA lawsuit settlements and aligns with the DOJ's Title II rule requiring WCAG 2.1 AA compliance for public entity websites.

How much does ADA compliance cost for a credit union website?

Costs vary based on website size and complexity. A small credit union with a basic website can expect to spend $5,000 to $15,000 for audit and remediation. Mid-size credit unions typically spend $15,000 to $50,000. Large credit unions with digital banking platforms may invest $50,000+ for a comprehensive program.

Can an accessibility overlay make my credit union compliant?

No. Accessibility overlays are widely opposed by disability advocacy organizations and cannot achieve genuine WCAG compliance. They may be useful as a temporary bridge solution but should never be presented as a compliance solution.

How long does it take to make a credit union website ADA compliant?

A thorough WCAG 2.2 AA compliance project for a mid-size credit union typically takes 3 to 6 months. Quick fixes (alt text, contrast, headings) can be addressed in days, but comprehensive remediation of all workflows, third-party integrations, and content requires a phased approach.

What happens if a credit union gets sued for ADA non-compliance?

Typical outcomes include monetary damages or settlement payments ($15,000 to $75,000+), court-ordered remediation with aggressive timelines, payment of plaintiff's attorney's fees, quarterly compliance reporting to the plaintiff's counsel, and public reputation damage. The total cost of a lawsuit almost always exceeds the cost of proactive compliance.

Does WCAG 2.2 apply to mobile banking apps?

Yes. WCAG applies to web content regardless of device. While native mobile applications have their own accessibility guidelines (iOS VoiceOver and Android TalkBack), web-based mobile banking accessed through a browser must meet WCAG requirements. Many credit unions are now requesting VPATs and accessibility documentation from their digital banking vendors.

References

1. We. Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 . W3C Recommendation
2. Americans with Disabilities Act . Law and Regulations, ADA.gov
3. DOJ Final Rule on Web and Mobile App Accessibility Under Title II of the ADA (April 2024)
4. CDC . Disability Impacts All of Us
5. American Institutes for Research . The Economic Costs and Benefits of Disability
6. National Federation of the Blind . Website Accessibility Position Statement
7. NCUA Regulations . Part 701: Organization and Operation of Federal Credit Unions
8. WebA11y , 2025 ADA Website Lawsuit Statistics and Trends
9. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative . WCAG Overview
10. Section 508.gov . IT Accessibility Laws and Policies
11. W3C . Understanding WCAG 2.2 Success Criteria
12. NCUA . Letters to Credit Unions and Regulatory Guidance
13. GrafWeb CUSO . Credit Union Website Accessibility Services

This article was brought to you by GrafWeb CUSO . Building the future of digital credit unions. Learn more about our credit union website design and ADA compliance services.

Not sure if your credit union's website is ADA compliant? We'll assess it for free. Request your complimentary ADA audit →